The Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice is a national, nonprofit organization, dedicated to advancing the rights of working people and their communities. We work for economic and social justice by binding corporations and government to their legal and moral responsibilities. The Sugar Law Center has been at the forefront of WARN Act litigation since 1992. Together with our cooperating attorneys, Sugar Law has represented thousands of workers in hundreds of WARN Act cases throughout the country.

The Sugar Law Center is affiliated with the National Lawyers Guild.

warnact

The United States Congress and a number of state legislatures had WARN Act reform legislation pending for much of the past year. Workers rights advocates saw one notable victory and a number of initiatives that lays the groundwork for future efforts. In too many instances however, good bills were introduced but saw no meaningful action after being referred to legislative committee.  Following entries provide a recap of legislative initiatives that were put forward and/or considered by federal and state legislatures during the previous year. United States Congress: The FOREWARN Act of 2009 was introducedbefore the House of Representatives by Rep. … Continue reading

January 27th, 2011

The United States Congress and a number of state legislatures had WARN Act reform legislation pending for much of the past year. Workers rights advocates saw one notable victory and a number of initiatives that lays the groundwork for future efforts. In too many instances however, good bills were introduced but saw no meaningful action after being referred to legislative committee.  Following entries provide a recap of legislative initiatives that were put forward and/or considered by federal and state legislatures during the previous year. United States Congress: The FOREWARN Act of 2009 was introduced before the House of Representatives by … Continue reading

December 23rd, 2010

With record high job dislocation in recent years, the nation’s courts have been confronted with numerous related lawsuits, many of which have been filed based on  violations of the WARN Act.  The following summaries detail decisions entered in recent months.     Platt v. Freedom Mortg. Corp. (D.N.J. 2010).  Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendant terminated their employment as part of a mass layoff in January 2010 without giving the required advance notice under the WARN Act.  The Defendant moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim and asserted that only 44 of the 60 employees were laid off.  The court recognized … Continue reading

December 22nd, 2010

In November, the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of labor Statistics released extended mass layoff statistics for the third quarter of 2010.  In this quarter, employers initiated 1,297 mass layoff events which resulted in the separation of 187,091 workers from their jobs.  The numbers reflect a drop from the record highs experienced in 2009, but continue to represent historically high numbers.  The official unemployment rate of 9.5% is nearly unchanged from last year. Among the four census regions, the West and Northeast were hardest hit by recent extended mass layoffs.  California, followed by New York, and then Florida were the … Continue reading

December 22nd, 2010

Earlier this year, a bill, Senate File No. 3198, was introduced before the Minnesota Senate with provisions that would require employers to provide advance notice to workers facing a mass layoff or worksite closing.  The bill is sponsored by Senator David Tomassoni and has been referred to the Senate Business, Industry and Jobs Committee. The bill's requirements are substantively similar to those found in an earlier companion House bill, House File No. 1963.  Most notably, the legislation would permit state officials to enforce advance notice regulations that are currently voluntary.  See our June 26, 2009 blog entry for a further discussion of requirements that are now … Continue reading

August 26th, 2010

A couple of developments passed under the radar during the past year.  Indiana legislation amended state unemployment insurance laws and Hawaii's legislature is considering a bill, both of which potentially implicate displaced workers rights.    In Indiana, amendments to the unemployment insurance statute at IC-22-4-32-23 include provisions that require notice to the state when a company is considering dissolution, liquidation, or withdrawal of business entities from Indiana.  Within 30 days of adopting a plan to take such actions,  a company must file written notification with the Department of Workforce Development.  The notification must indentify: (1) the corporation’s assets, (2) the corporation’s liabilities, (3) the details of the plan or resolution, (4) the names of the corporate … Continue reading

August 26th, 2010

Earlier this year, a bill to require advance notification to workers and communities facing sudden job loss was placed before the Pennsylvania House of Representatives.  The bill would provide expanded protections beyond that required by existing federal law.  House Bill 2390, the Pennsylvania Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, was introduced by Representatives White, Belfanti, Bradford, Brennan, Daley, DePasquale, Freeman, Gibbons, Hornaman, Josephs, Kula, Murt, M. O'Brien, Quinn, Santoni, Siproth, K. Smith and Thomas.  The bill was referred to the House Labor Relations Committee, where it remains pending.  The bill would require employers of fifty or more workers to provide ninety … Continue reading

August 5th, 2010

A couple of bills to amend existing state law and improve advance notification requirements in Massachusetts passed under our radar earlier this year, but remain pending before the 186th General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  In the House, an Act Relative to the Notification of Large Job Layoffs, House No. 1847 was introduced by Representative Michael Rush.  the bill was referred to the legislature's Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development, where it remains.    In the Senate, a similar bill was introduced by Senators Anthony Petruccelli, Gloria Fox, Willie Mae Allen and Elizabeth Malia.  The bill, Senate No. 204, was referred to the … Continue reading

August 1st, 2010

On July 1, 2010, the Iowa Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act came into effect providing additional protections for workers facing layoffs.  The law represents a well-deserved victory for advocates who have proposed such legislation during a number of legislative sessions over the past fifteen years.  The present law was passed by the state House of Representatives on January 27 and the Iowa Senate on March 10 and then signed into law by Governor Chet Culver on March 22, 2010.  By its terms, the law was to take effect on July 1. Iowa's law expands protections to workers beyond those provided by the … Continue reading

July 31st, 2010

 Last spring, Representative Ryan Winkler introduced legislation (H.F. No. 1963) to provide enforcement provisions to the advance notice requirements of an existing statute, which presently has none.  This month, Representative Denise Dittrich joined as a co-author to the bill.  Representative John Ward had previously joined as a co-author.  The bill was recommended for passage by the Civil Justice Committee in 2009, however due to an odd-year adjournment, the bill was returned to that Committee where it remains pending.   For more information on the Minnesota legislation, see our June 26, 2009 entry.

February 26th, 2010

The Rhode Island Worker Protection and Job Loss Prevention Act, (S2233 & H7462) was introduced before the state Senate on February 9, 2010 and reintroduced before the state House of Representatives on February 11.  The Senate bill is sponsored by Senators Frank DeVall, John Tassoni, Elizabeth Crowley, and Frank Ciccone and has been referred to the Senate Labor Committee.  The House version is sponsored by Representatives Roberto DaSilva, Helio Melo, John Savage, John Carnevale, and Arthur Corvese and has been referred to the House Labor Committee.  The bills' requirements are substantially similar to legislation introduced before the House during the last legislative session and in the wake of the Colibri … Continue reading

February 25th, 2010

On February 2, 2010, Ohio Representative Kenny Yuko introduced a well-crafted bill (H.B. 434) that would require employers to provide their employees with advance notice of mass layoffs, worksite closings, and transfers of operation.  The legislation is co-sponsored by Representatives Robert Hagan, Mike Foley, Tom Letson, Clayton Luckie, Debbie Phillips, Marian Harris and John Domenick.  The bill imposes few, if any, expenses and no new taxes on Ohio businesses, while providing meaningful accountability for companies that violate the notification rights of workers and local communities who suffer the direct impact of sudden job loss. Ohio's bill would apply to employers of fifty or more workers and require ninety days advance notice of … Continue reading

February 24th, 2010

Earlier this month, New Jersey legislators in the state Assembly and the Senate re-introduced innovative bills that would allow:  Qualified individuals who have been  affected by business closings and mass layoffs to receive a temporary suspension of interest payments interest on mortgage loans. (Introduced as Assembly Bill No. 1939 and Senate Bill No. 992);  State officials to seek immediate injunctive relief when advance notice is not provided. (Introduced as Assembly Bill No. 1985 and Senate Bill No. 977); and Laid off workers to receive free tuition at New Jersey state colleges for job training courses when the course has room for additional students and no other financial aid … Continue reading

February 23rd, 2010

By a vote of 81-18, the Iowa House of Representatives passed a bill requiring employers to provide advance notice of business closings and mass layoffs to affected workers and local communities.  The bill was  proposed by the Iowa Department of Workforce Development and introduced before the House in March 2009.  The House Labor Committee was assigned to review the bill and issued its report recommending passage on January 22, 2010.  The bill passed on a vote of the full house on January 27, 2010 and was then messaged to the state Senate.  The proposed legislation (SSB 1055) has now been … Continue reading

February 22nd, 2010

Over the past several weeks, New Mexico state officials sought legislation to reduce the time that dislocated workers spend on unemployment and to provide stability to local communities by requiring the state's largest employers to provide advance notice of worksite closings and mass layoffs.  With the support of New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson's office, House Bill No. 180 was introduced by state Representative Mimi Stewart on January 26, 2010.  The bill would require large employers to provide 60 days notice of worksite closings and mass layoffs affecting 25 or more workers.  The proposed law would also permit the state attorney general to bring suit on … Continue reading

February 22nd, 2010

The U.S. Department of Labor has reported final numbers for 2009 mass layoffs. As defined by the Department, a mass layoff event is one where a single establishment has at least 50 initial unemployment insurance claims filed against it within a prescribed time period.  The total number of mass layoff events in 2009 is estimated at 28,030 on a non-seasonally adjusted basis.  The 2009 numbers are the highest since the Department began tracking this information in 1995.   Likewise, the 2009 Department of Labor numbers for extended mass layoff events are also the highest annual numbers on record. Extended mass layoffs are actions where a single … Continue reading

February 21st, 2010

On January 1, 2010, New Hampshire’s state WARN Act went into  effect. The law requires employers to provide advance notice to  employees before mass layoffs or plant closings. The law applies to more employers and protects more workers than existing federal legislation by lowering numerical thresholds for determining when notice is required.  The law also contains innovative provisions that empower the state labor commissioner to determine liabilities for violations and that provide a lien upon business revenues and company property for sums owed under the Act.

February 21st, 2010

Following termination of operations at its printing facility, Insync Marketing Solutions, LLC (Insync) laid off approximately 230 workers and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection. Insync also filed a letter with the California Labor Commissioner and the Department of Industrial Relations seeking a ruling on the company’s liability under the California WARN Act.  Insync argued that although 60 day advance notice of the layoffs was not provided to workers, the company met the faltering company exception in section 1402.5 of the state law.  The faltering company exception has three required elements under 1402.5(a).    The California Labor Commissioner reviewed the … Continue reading

February 21st, 2010

Since early this year, the Wisconsin State Assembly and State Senate have been considering companion bills to provide modest amendments to the state WARN Act.  On November 3, 2009, Bill 266 passed the Assembly and was messaged to the Senate.  The Senate concurred on November 5.  The Governor approved the bill and it became law on December 1.  The amendments allow local workforce development boards to provide additional resources to workers facing potential worksite  closings and mass layoffs.  (Note: as a result of the Assembly's passage of its bill, the Senate's companion bill, SB 183, was laid on the table). 

December 7th, 2009

The American Observer posts a multimedia presentation by Latoya Egwuekwe that starkly reveals the spread of deepening unemployment across the nation.  Using U.S. Dept of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics data, the presentation titled The Decline: The Geography of a Recession graphically shows continuing increases in county unemployment rates from January 2007 through the present. 

December 6th, 2009

The U.S. Department of Labor released its third quarter report for extended mass layoffs.  The report finds a record high number of extended mass layoffs for any third quarter previously reported (since data was first collected in 1995).  The 1,776 extended mass layoff events affected more than 275,000 workers.  The Western and Midwestern states were the hardest hit.  Since being introduced before the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, WARN Act reform bills (FOREWARN Act) S. 1374 and H.R. 3042 have been referred to and remain pending before committees of both chambers.

November 11th, 2009

Governor John Lynch signed the New Hampshire Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act into law today.  The Governor's press release on the signing states that "new law sends a strong message to New Hampshire workers that we care about their hard work, and we care about them and their families."   The law will take effect January 1, 2010 and provides a number of protections beyond those found in federal legislation.  For further information on the law, see our June 26,2009 entry.

August 10th, 2009

U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown's proposed legislation has been assigned bill no. S. 1374.  The bill has been read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.  The Senate H.E.L.P. Committee is chaired Senator Edward M. Kennedy.  Committee members by rank include: Democrats by Rank: Edward Kennedy (MA), Christopher Dodd (CT), Tom Harkin (IA), Barbara A. Mikulski (MD), Jeff Bingaman (NM), Patty Murray (WA), Jack Reed (RI), Bernard Sanders (I) (VT), Sherrod Brown (OH), Robert P. Casey, Jr. (PA), Kay Hagan (NC) and Jeff Merkley (OR). Republicans by Rank: Michael B. Enzi (WY), Judd Gregg (NH) ,Lamar … Continue reading

July 5th, 2009

Rep. George Miller and Rep. John McHugh's bill, H.R. 3042, has been referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor. The Committee is chaired by Rep. George Miller. Committee members include: Democrats by Rank: George Miller (CA-07), Dale E. Kildee (MI-05),Donald M. Payne (NJ-10), Robert E. Andrews (NJ-01), Robert C. Scott (VA-03), Lynn C. Woolsey (CA-06), Rubén Hinojosa (TX-15) Carolyn McCarthy (NY-04), John F. Tierney (MA-06), Dennis J. Kucinich (OH-10), David Wu (OR-01), Rush D. Holt (NJ-12), Susan A. Davis (CA-53), Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07), Timothy H. Bishop (NY-01), Joe Sestak (PA-07), Dave Loebsack (IA-02), Mazie Hirono (HI-02), Jason … Continue reading

July 5th, 2009

On June 25, 2009, Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Representatives George Miller (D-CA), Chairman of the U.S. House Education and Labor Committee, and John McHugh (R-NY) introduced companion bills before the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives (S.____ and H.R. 3042).  The bills would amend the WARN Act to improve advance notice and strengthen enforcement for the protection of workers facing the loss of their jobs as the result of business closings and mass layoffs.   Rep. Miller's press release reads: WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Representatives George Miller (D-CA), Chairman of the U.S. House … Continue reading

June 29th, 2009

In a June 28, 2009 article, In These Times contributing editor, Kari Lydersen, provides an update on the courageous struggles of former Colibri Group workers to obtain back pay under the WARN Act.  Ms. Lydersen also has a forthcoming book, Revolt On Goose Island: The Chicago Factory Takeover, and What It Says About The Economic Crisis, which covers the sit-in by Republic Windows workers earlier this year at a factory in Chicago.  Among other issues, the Republic Windows sit-in occurred in response to the employer's failure to meet WARN Act requirements.

June 29th, 2009

In the New Hampshire General Court, the Senate and House of Representatives have passed the New Hampshire Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.  The Act has been submitted to the Governor for signature. The Act would apply to any employer of 75 or more full-time workers in the state and requires employers to provide 60 days advance notice of a plant closing or mass layoffs.  Plant closings are defined as a shutdown of operations affecting 50 or more full-time employees.  Mass layoffs are defined as an employment loss at a single site of employment that affects 250 or more full-time … Continue reading

June 26th, 2009

The Minnesota State Legislature has taken up legislation to empower to the state labor commissioner to enforce the advance notice requirements of an existing statute (Chpt. 116L, § 116L.976).  Currently the state has a well-intentioned but highly ineffective statute that asks businesses to voluntarily comply with advance notice to workers facing a worksite closing or mass layoff.  As a result, the state statute is rarely observed in practice. (Michigan has a similar statute).  While voluntary statutes can inform good faith employers who need guidance, these statutes too frequently provide bad faith actors with short term marketplace advantages over companies who … Continue reading

June 26th, 2009

The midwest "I" states have been moving towards enactment of state advance notice legislation. Illinois passed state legislation in 2005.   Indiana has introduced such legislation during the past three legislative sessions and Iowa has introduced bills during the last two sessions.   In February, Representative Dennis Tyler authored and along with Representatives  Terri Austin, John Bartlett and David Niezgodski introduced House Bill 1166 before the Indiana House of Representatives.  The bill would require advance notice of business closures or mass layoffs. The bill applies to any employers of between 50 and 100 employees in the state and the definition of employers … Continue reading

June 26th, 2009

Alert Laid Off Employees in Reasonable Time Act.  On April 23, 2009, U.S. Representative Luis Gutierrez introduced House Bill 2077.  The bill would require an employer to give 60-day written notice to employees and to appropriate state and local government officials before ordering a mass layoff that results in employment loss for a single employer at more than one site of employment when the layoff affects at least 50 employees representing 33% of the full-time employees or affects 500 or more employees.  Violators would be liable to each aggrieved employee for double the back pay.  The bill was referred to … Continue reading

June 23rd, 2009

Gross v. Hale-Halsell Co., 554 F.3d 870 (2009).  Plaintiffs were employed by Hale-Halsell Co. (“HHC”). HHC owned fifty percent of United Supermarkets, which was also HHC’s largest customer. At times, HHC failed to meet orders that United requested. United terminated the relationship, and HHC began experiencing financial troubles.  In January 2004, HHC met with some of its employees informing them of impending layoffs. Approximately two hundred employees were to be laid off the very next day. The plaintiffs brought this action and HHC moved for summary judgment on the basis that it was excused from the WARN Act requirements based … Continue reading

June 23rd, 2009

The Wisconsin Legislature is considering two bills that would amend the state's existing statute that requires advance notice to workers before business shutdowns and mass layoffs.  Assembly Bill 266 and Senate Bill 183 would strengthen procedures for providing information to workers and services from the state's rapid response team.  The bills would also create civil penalties for violations of the state's advance notification law.  The Assembly's bill is presently before the Committee on Workforce Development and the Senate bil is before the Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs. 

June 23rd, 2009

We missed this one earlier this year.  In Mississippi, House Bill No. 682 was introduced  to require advance notice to workers faced with a business closing or mass layoff.  The bill was authored by Rep. William J. McCoy.  The bill's provisions were  substantially similar to the requirements of the federal WARN Act.  The bill however would have allowed the state Attorney General to bring suit on behalf of aggrieved employees and municipalities. Unfortunately, the calendar deadline expired without passage, but hopefully will be reintroduced and acted upon in the next legislation.  Rep. McCoy and the co-authors (Rep. Bill Moak, Rep.George … Continue reading

June 22nd, 2009

In the North Carolina General Assembly, Representatives Rick Glazier, Marvin Lucas, Deborah Ross, and Bill Faison introduced House Bill 1169 earlier this year.  The bill was filed, passed a first reading and was referred to the House Committee on Commerce, Small Business and Enterpreneurship.  The bill remains in committee.  The bill would require an employer to provide written notice at least 90 calendar days in advance of a plant closing or a mass layoff.  Plant closings and mass layoffs are defined similarly to the federal statute.  A WARN-NC notice is required when an employer is laying off at least 50 … Continue reading

June 22nd, 2009

California's bill to amend the state's advance notification statute passed the Assembly Committee on  Labor and Employment and was then referred to the Committee on Appropriations where the bil has received two hearings and remains pending.  However certain deadlines for fiscal approval have passed and it is uncertain whether further action on the bill will occur this year. After its introduction, the bill was targeted by chamber of commerce organizations  who have far too-frequently opposed sustainable and ethical business practices   Our friends in the business community are encouraged to contact their local chambers of commerce and support policies, leadership and … Continue reading

June 21st, 2009

On February 26,2009, California Assembly Member Sandré Swanson introduced legislation to amend the advance notification provisions of the state Labor Code. Most notably, Assembly Bill 842 seeks to amend the Code to require that: Employers provide 90 days advance notice of a plant closing or mass layoff. State law presently requires 60 days advance notice; The California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) maintain a guide of benefits and services available to dislocated workers and maintain a guide of economic development benefits and services for employers to avert plant closings and mass layoffs; The LWDA transmit the guides an employer … Continue reading

April 26th, 2009

On Wednesday April 8, 2009, New Hampshire's bill (SB 40) to require advance notice of worksite closings and mass layoffs passed the state Senate.  The bill was introduced before the state House of Representatives on the following day and is now pending before the House Labor, Industrial, and Rehabilitative Services Committee.  A public hearing is scheduled on the bill on April 28, 2009 at 10:00 am.  The bill is due out of Committee on May 28, 2009.

April 26th, 2009

In the wake of the Colibri Group's closing of a Rhode Island jewelry factory without advance notice to workers, Representative Roberto DaSilva has introduced legislation before the state House of Representatives to require advance notice of worksite closings and mass layoffs. The Rhode Island Worker Protection and Job Loss Notification Act (House Bill 5673) would apply to employers with 75 or more workers and to employer's facilities that have been in existence for over three years or have employed 75 or more workers at the site over the prior twelve months. Under the bill, employers would be required to provide 60 … Continue reading

April 26th, 2009

A bill that would require advance notification to workers and communities has been introduced before the New Hampshire Senate.  The bill would strengthen federal protections under the Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.  The bill would principally supplement federal law by:   Expanding the definition of covered employers to include businesses employing 75 or more full-time workers; Requiring advance notice to workers whenever between 25 and 249 workers who comprise one-third of the facility's workforce are laid off and requiring advance notice to all affected workers whenever 250 or more are laid off at a single facility; Granting the state … Continue reading

March 8th, 2009

The New York State Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, N.Y. Lab. L., Art. 25-A, Sec. 860 a-i., became effective on February 1, 2009.  The state law improves upon the federal legislation by providing for a longer notice period and providing coverage for more worksites and employees.  (See August 8, 2008 entry for a summary of the Act's requirements).  Following its taking effect, the New York Department of Labor filed Emergency/Proposed Rules for the interpretation and implementation of the Act.   Among other requirements, the rules include provisions that: Require all references to 'days' in the Act to be interpreted as … Continue reading

March 4th, 2009

In February 2009, the Republic Windows’ Chicago factory was sold to Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Serious Materials, Inc.  Serious Materials is a manufacturer of environmentally sustainable construction products.  Serious Materials has pledged to reopen the factory and hire back the factory’s former workers. On December 2 last year, the owners of Republic Windows and Doors announced that their Chicago factory would be shutting down in three days.  In the weeks preceding, the company’s union workers noticed equipment being moved out of the plant at night and suspected that the owners were selling off equipment and planning to close the facility.  With the … Continue reading

February 26th, 2009

Selected presidential candidate's positions regarding protection of workers faced with job loss during mass layoffs and worksite closings are set forth below: Barack Obama (Democrat) supports WARN Act reform and is a cosponsor to Sen. Sherrod Brown's bill, the FOREWARN Act of 2007 (S 1792).  The FOREWARN Act of 2007 includes provisions that strengthen the WARN Act by lowering thresholds to bring more workers within the Act's protections and by extending the advance notification period from 60 days to 90 days. Bob Barr (Libertarian) has not expressed an opinion regarding WARN Act reform and did not have the opportunity to … Continue reading

October 14th, 2008

Zack Reed has introduced a draft ordinance before the Cleveland City Council that would require certain local businesses to provide 60 day advance notice of a store closure.    Council member Reed's ordinance targets shops occupying 3,000 or more square feet of floor space. The ordinance would principally effect retailers, chain drug stores, and restaurants.  The City of Cleveland presently has a local law requiring businesses occupying 150,000 square feet or more to notify the city fire chief 60 days before abandoning a building.  

October 3rd, 2008

As noted in an earlier post, legislation to require advance notification to workers faced with job loss resulting from a mass layoff or plant closing was introduced in the New York State Assembly (A.10847) and Senate (S.08212).  On June 17, the Senate bill passed that body, was delivered to the Assembly, and was subsequently substituted for A.10847 in the Assembly.  The bill passed the Assembly and was delivered to the Governor for signature on July 25, 2008.  Governor David Paterson signed the bill during the first week of August.   The new law will go into effect on February 1, 2009. … Continue reading

August 8th, 2008

In the wake of the sudden closing of Jevic Transportation Inc. in Delanco, New Jersey, Assemblymen Herb Conaway Jr. and Jack Conners and Senators Stephen M. Sweeney and Jeff Van Drew have introduced forward thinking legislation to strengthen the protections of the state’s Millville Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act. Assembly Bill 2934 and Senate Bill 1956 would allow workers to defer payment of interest on mortgage loans for their primary residence for a period of up to 180 days when their employers violate advance notice requirements. The proposed bills seek to stabilize communities and keep workers in their … Continue reading

June 19th, 2008

On May 20th, the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee held a hearing on Plant Closings, Workers Rights and The WARN Act's 20th Anniversary.   Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) chaired the hearing and received testimony from: John Philo, Esq., Legal Director, Sugar Law Center for Economic & Social Justice, Detroit, MIRichard L. Trumka, Secretary-Treasurer, AFL-CIO, Washington, DCJoe Aguiar, Laid-Off Worker from the Quaker Mill plant, Fall River, MA Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Principal, Miles & Stockbridge, P.C., Baltimore, MD The full hearing can be viewed online at the H.E.L.P. Committee's website.  If you would like to receive a copy … Continue reading

June 3rd, 2008

Legislation has been introduced in the New York State Assembly (A.10847) and Senate (S.08212) that would provide advance notification to workers facing a mass layoff or workplace closing.  Both bills have reported out of committee. The bills would require advance notice at many work-sites presently exempted from federal WARN Act requirements.   The bills would apply to employers of 50 or more full-time workers and require 90 days advance notice.  In addition to allowing workers to bring lawsuits, the bills also permit enforcement by the state's Commissioner of Labor.  The federal WARN Act only applies to employers of 100 or more … Continue reading

May 31st, 2008

The Iowa General Assembly is considering two bills – Senate File 2332 (successor to Senate Study Bill 3260) and House Study Bill 739 – that would require employers to provide 60 days advance notice to workers facing a mass layoff.  The proposed bills would apply to employers of 25 or more workers  who lay off 25 or more employees.  Under the federal WARN Act, advance notice is required when employers of 100 or more workers layoff 50 or more employees.  Noting the lower thresholds, the Daily Iowan quotes state Sen. Dick Dearden as follows: "In a small community, it's a … Continue reading

March 27th, 2008

In Meson v. GATX Technology Services Corporation, 507 F.3d 803 (C.A.4 2007) the court held that an employee’s home office was her “single site of employment” for purposes of the WARN Act, affirming a lower court’s summary judgment decision in favor of the employer. The court reasoned that the home office where the sales representative was based, and not the headquarters to which she reported, was her “single site of employment” for purposes of the 50-employee single-site layoff requirement. The court found that WARN Act provisions applicable to “workers whose primary duties require travel from point to point” was intended … Continue reading

February 21st, 2008

As reported in an earlier prior post, the Early Warning and Health Care for Workers Affected by Globalization Act (HR 3796) was introduced by Rep. George Miller and subsequently attached to the Trade and Globalization Act of 2007 (HR 3920), which passed the House and is now under consideration by the Senate.  The Senate is also  considering its own trade bill, the Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2007 (S 1848).  The Senate's version does not presently include WARN Act amendments.   Both bills are pending before the Senate Finance Committee and seek to renew Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) programs … Continue reading

January 28th, 2008

The Millville Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act (A1044) became state law on December 20, 2007 after the New Jersey state legislature concurred in amendments requested by the Governor.  The Act substantially mirrors the requirements of the federal WARN Act; however contains a few important differences.  Most notably, the state law increases the value of potential awards to long term employees by calculating damages based on average weekly pay multiplied by the employee's years of service.  For workers who have been employed at the site for longer than eight years, potential awards may exceed those available under the federal … Continue reading

January 23rd, 2008

The Early Warning and Health Care for Workers Affected by Globalization Act (HR 3796) was introduced by Rep. George Miller, D-Calif in the United States House of Representatives on October 10, 2007. The bill was considered by the Committee on Education and Labor and recommended to the entire House. The bill was then attached to the Trade and Globalization Act of 2007 (HR 3920) and passed the House by a vote of 264 in favor, 157 against, and 11 member not present/abstaining.  Along with the House version, the Senate is considering its own trade bill, the Trade and Globalization Adjustment … Continue reading

December 9th, 2007

On July 16, 2007, Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio introduced the FOREWARN Act of 2007 (S 1792) into the United States Senate. The bill was referred to and is presently under consideration by the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. Sen. Brown's office was the first to introduce WARN Act amendments before the 110th Congress and has been active in seeking passage of such amendments.  The Sugar Law Center supports S. 1792 and asks all interested persons to contact their Senators to express support for the legislation.  S. 1792 includes the following provisions to strengthen the WARN Act: Lowers the … Continue reading

December 8th, 2007

Since January of 2006, the New Jersey state legislature had been considering a bill to provide advance notification to workers of plant closings and mass layoffs. The Millville Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act (A1044) passed the New Jersey State Assembly and was amended and then passed by the State Senate. The two bodies conferred and the Assembly subsequently passed the amended bill. On November 8, 2007, Governor Jon Corzine conditionally vetoed the Act and returned it to the legislature for further amendments to provide 60 days advance notice to workers, rather than the 90 day notice period provided … Continue reading

December 6th, 2007

Address: 4605 Cass Avenue, Second Floor Detroit MI 48201 | Phone: (313) 993-4505

This website provides general information to people interested in the Sugar Law Center. Visitors should not consider the information available via this website to be an invitation for an attorney-client relationship, should not rely on the information provided herein as legal advice for any purpose, and should always seek the legal advice of competent counsel in the relevant jurisdiction regarding specific facts and legal issues.

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Sugar Law Center

for Economic & Social Justice